Among the underlying components of the Russell 3000 index, we saw noteworthy options trading volume today in Nordstrom, Inc. (Symbol: JWN), where a total of 127,459 contracts have traded so far, representing approximately 12.7 million underlying shares. That amounts to about 226.2% of JWN’s average daily trading volume over the past month of 5.6 million shares. Especially high volume was seen for the $25 strike put option expiring March 17, 2023, with 12,332 contracts trading so far today, representing approximately 1.2 million underlying shares of JWN. Below is a chart showing JWN’s trailing twelve month trading history, with the $25 strike highlighted in orange:
C3.ai Inc (Symbol: AI) options are showing a volume of 201,798 contracts thus far today. That number of contracts represents approximately 20.2 million underlying shares, working out to a sizeable 202.9% of AI’s average daily trading volume over the past month, of 9.9 million shares.
Particularly high volume was seen for the $26 strike call option expiring February 03, 2023, with 8,481 contracts trading so far today, representing approximately 848,100 underlying shares of AI. Below is a chart showing AI’s trailing twelve month trading history, with the $26 strike highlighted in orange:
And Post Holdings Inc (Symbol: POST) saw options trading volume of 5,314 contracts, representing approximately 531,400 underlying shares or approximately 128.6% of POST’s average daily trading volume over the past month, of 413,135 shares.
Particularly high volume was seen for the $100 strike call option expiring February 17, 2023, with 3,008 contracts trading so far today, representing approximately 300,800 underlying shares of POST. Below is a chart showing POST’s trailing twelve month trading history, with the $100 strike highlighted in orange:
For the various different available expirations for JWN options, AI options, or POST options, visit StockOptionsChannel.com.
Also see:
DSI YTD Return
Funds Holding IBLC
TMUS YTD Return
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.
Image and article originally from www.nasdaq.com. Read the original article here.