Among the underlying components of the Russell 3000 index, we saw noteworthy options trading volume today in Estee Lauder Cos., Inc. (Symbol: EL), where a total of 13,752 contracts have traded so far, representing approximately 1.4 million underlying shares. That amounts to about 48.2% of EL’s average daily trading volume over the past month of 2.9 million shares. Particularly high volume was seen for the $165 strike put option expiring September 15, 2023, with 1,851 contracts trading so far today, representing approximately 185,100 underlying shares of EL. Below is a chart showing EL’s trailing twelve month trading history, with the $165 strike highlighted in orange:
Lumentum Holdings Inc (Symbol: LITE) saw options trading volume of 8,888 contracts, representing approximately 888,800 underlying shares or approximately 47.7% of LITE’s average daily trading volume over the past month, of 1.9 million shares.
Particularly high volume was seen for the $47.50 strike put option expiring September 15, 2023, with 3,729 contracts trading so far today, representing approximately 372,900 underlying shares of LITE. Below is a chart showing LITE’s trailing twelve month trading history, with the $47.50 strike highlighted in orange:
And International Game Technology PLC (Symbol: IGT) saw options trading volume of 3,606 contracts, representing approximately 360,600 underlying shares or approximately 47.5% of IGT’s average daily trading volume over the past month, of 759,665 shares.
Especially high volume was seen for the $18 strike put option expiring January 16, 2026, with 1,134 contracts trading so far today, representing approximately 113,400 underlying shares of IGT. Below is a chart showing IGT’s trailing twelve month trading history, with the $18 strike highlighted in orange:
For the various different available expirations for EL options, LITE options, or IGT options, visit StockOptionsChannel.com.
Also see:
Top Ten Hedge Funds Holding CLOV
XIN shares outstanding history
Industrial mergers and acquisitions
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.
Image and article originally from www.nasdaq.com. Read the original article here.