Among the underlying components of the Russell 3000 index, we saw noteworthy options trading volume today in Mastercard Inc (Symbol: MA), where a total of 15,623 contracts have traded so far, representing approximately 1.6 million underlying shares. That amounts to about 47.2% of MA’s average daily trading volume over the past month of 3.3 million shares. Especially high volume was seen for the $300 strike put option expiring October 14, 2022, with 1,011 contracts trading so far today, representing approximately 101,100 underlying shares of MA. Below is a chart showing MA’s trailing twelve month trading history, with the $300 strike highlighted in orange:
Hasbro, Inc. (Symbol: HAS) options are showing a volume of 6,167 contracts thus far today. That number of contracts represents approximately 616,700 underlying shares, working out to a sizeable 44.7% of HAS’s average daily trading volume over the past month, of 1.4 million shares.
Particularly high volume was seen for the $67.50 strike put option expiring October 21, 2022, with 1,632 contracts trading so far today, representing approximately 163,200 underlying shares of HAS. Below is a chart showing HAS’s trailing twelve month trading history, with the $67.50 strike highlighted in orange:
And Adobe Inc (Symbol: ADBE) options are showing a volume of 23,195 contracts thus far today. That number of contracts represents approximately 2.3 million underlying shares, working out to a sizeable 44.1% of ADBE’s average daily trading volume over the past month, of 5.3 million shares.
Especially high volume was seen for the $280 strike put option expiring October 14, 2022, with 1,155 contracts trading so far today, representing approximately 115,500 underlying shares of ADBE. Below is a chart showing ADBE’s trailing twelve month trading history, with the $280 strike highlighted in orange:
For the various different available expirations for MA options, HAS options, or ADBE options, visit StockOptionsChannel.com.
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.
Image and article originally from www.nasdaq.com. Read the original article here.