Among the underlying components of the Russell 3000 index, we saw noteworthy options trading volume today in CAVA Group Inc (Symbol: CAVA), where a total of 7,930 contracts have traded so far, representing approximately 793,000 underlying shares. That amounts to about 50.9% of CAVA’s average daily trading volume over the past month of 1.6 million shares. Especially high volume was seen for the $46 strike call option expiring January 26, 2024, with 1,655 contracts trading so far today, representing approximately 165,500 underlying shares of CAVA. Below is a chart showing CAVA’s trailing twelve month trading history, with the $46 strike highlighted in orange:
Etsy Inc (Symbol: ETSY) options are showing a volume of 19,404 contracts thus far today. That number of contracts represents approximately 1.9 million underlying shares, working out to a sizeable 50.6% of ETSY’s average daily trading volume over the past month, of 3.8 million shares.
Especially high volume was seen for the $45 strike put option expiring June 21, 2024, with 2,972 contracts trading so far today, representing approximately 297,200 underlying shares of ETSY. Below is a chart showing ETSY’s trailing twelve month trading history, with the $45 strike highlighted in orange:
And Marathon Petroleum Corp. (Symbol: MPC) saw options trading volume of 14,005 contracts, representing approximately 1.4 million underlying shares or approximately 49.4% of MPC’s average daily trading volume over the past month, of 2.8 million shares.
Particularly high volume was seen for the $157.50 strike call option expiring January 26, 2024, with 2,650 contracts trading so far today, representing approximately 265,000 underlying shares of MPC. Below is a chart showing MPC’s trailing twelve month trading history, with the $157.50 strike highlighted in orange:
For the various different available expirations for CAVA options, ETSY options, or MPC options, visit StockOptionsChannel.com.
Also see:
Funds Holding CAN
Funds Holding JWSM
Institutional Holders of KRUZ
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.
Image and article originally from www.nasdaq.com. Read the original article here.