Among the underlying components of the Russell 3000 index, we saw noteworthy options trading volume today in Enviva Inc (Symbol: EVA), where a total of 2,095 contracts have traded so far, representing approximately 209,500 underlying shares. That amounts to about 49.4% of EVA’s average daily trading volume over the past month of 423,945 shares. Especially high volume was seen for the $40 strike put option expiring March 17, 2023, with 533 contracts trading so far today, representing approximately 53,300 underlying shares of EVA. Below is a chart showing EVA’s trailing twelve month trading history, with the $40 strike highlighted in orange:
Macy’s Inc (Symbol: M) saw options trading volume of 40,314 contracts, representing approximately 4.0 million underlying shares or approximately 49.1% of M’s average daily trading volume over the past month, of 8.2 million shares.
Especially high volume was seen for the $20.50 strike put option expiring March 03, 2023, with 2,488 contracts trading so far today, representing approximately 248,800 underlying shares of M. Below is a chart showing M’s trailing twelve month trading history, with the $20.50 strike highlighted in orange:
And Citigroup Inc (Symbol: C) options are showing a volume of 79,098 contracts thus far today. That number of contracts represents approximately 7.9 million underlying shares, working out to a sizeable 48.4% of C’s average daily trading volume over the past month, of 16.3 million shares.
Particularly high volume was seen for the $55 strike call option expiring January 19, 2024, with 5,157 contracts trading so far today, representing approximately 515,700 underlying shares of C. Below is a chart showing C’s trailing twelve month trading history, with the $55 strike highlighted in orange:
For the various different available expirations for EVA options, M options, or C options, visit StockOptionsChannel.com.
Also see:
Funds Holding RSEE
CABO Historical Earnings
Funds Holding SPRX
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.
Image and article originally from www.nasdaq.com. Read the original article here.