Among the underlying components of the Russell 3000 index, we saw noteworthy options trading volume today in New York Community Bancorp Inc. (Symbol: NYCB), where a total of 197,294 contracts have traded so far, representing approximately 19.7 million underlying shares. That amounts to about 49.7% of NYCB’s average daily trading volume over the past month of 39.7 million shares. Especially high volume was seen for the $2.50 strike put option expiring March 15, 2024, with 54,592 contracts trading so far today, representing approximately 5.5 million underlying shares of NYCB. Below is a chart showing NYCB’s trailing twelve month trading history, with the $2.50 strike highlighted in orange:
Snap-On, Inc. (Symbol: SNA) saw options trading volume of 959 contracts, representing approximately 95,900 underlying shares or approximately 49% of SNA’s average daily trading volume over the past month, of 195,585 shares.
Particularly high volume was seen for the $260 strike put option expiring February 16, 2024, with 237 contracts trading so far today, representing approximately 23,700 underlying shares of SNA. Below is a chart showing SNA’s trailing twelve month trading history, with the $260 strike highlighted in orange:
And Twilio Inc (Symbol: TWLO) options are showing a volume of 10,441 contracts thus far today. That number of contracts represents approximately 1.0 million underlying shares, working out to a sizeable 47.3% of TWLO’s average daily trading volume over the past month, of 2.2 million shares.
Particularly high volume was seen for the $95 strike call option expiring February 16, 2024, with 917 contracts trading so far today, representing approximately 91,700 underlying shares of TWLO. Below is a chart showing TWLO’s trailing twelve month trading history, with the $95 strike highlighted in orange:
For the various different available expirations for NYCB options, SNA options, or TWLO options, visit StockOptionsChannel.com.
Also see:
Institutional Holders of PLBY
Institutional Holders of AEIS
FLRU Videos
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.
Image and article originally from www.nasdaq.com. Read the original article here.