Among the underlying components of the Russell 3000 index, we saw noteworthy options trading volume today in Unity Software Inc (Symbol: U), where a total of 61,760 contracts have traded so far, representing approximately 6.2 million underlying shares. That amounts to about 42.8% of U’s average daily trading volume over the past month of 14.4 million shares. Particularly high volume was seen for the $33 strike call option expiring December 15, 2023, with 6,764 contracts trading so far today, representing approximately 676,400 underlying shares of U. Below is a chart showing U’s trailing twelve month trading history, with the $33 strike highlighted in orange:
Nabors Industries Ltd (Symbol: NBR) saw options trading volume of 1,214 contracts, representing approximately 121,400 underlying shares or approximately 42% of NBR’s average daily trading volume over the past month, of 288,730 shares.
Particularly high volume was seen for the $90 strike call option expiring January 19, 2024, with 860 contracts trading so far today, representing approximately 86,000 underlying shares of NBR. Below is a chart showing NBR’s trailing twelve month trading history, with the $90 strike highlighted in orange:
And Honeywell International Inc (Symbol: HON) options are showing a volume of 10,082 contracts thus far today. That number of contracts represents approximately 1.0 million underlying shares, working out to a sizeable 41.1% of HON’s average daily trading volume over the past month, of 2.5 million shares.
Particularly high volume was seen for the $180 strike put option expiring February 16, 2024, with 2,025 contracts trading so far today, representing approximately 202,500 underlying shares of HON. Below is a chart showing HON’s trailing twelve month trading history, with the $180 strike highlighted in orange:
For the various different available expirations for U options, NBR options, or HON options, visit StockOptionsChannel.com.
Also see:
GSY Dividend History
BBW Options Chain
LOPE shares outstanding history
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.
Image and article originally from www.nasdaq.com. Read the original article here.