Voya Financial (VOYA) Q3 Earnings and Revenues Top Estimates


In afternoon trading on Tuesday, Energy stocks are the worst performing sector, showing a 0.7% loss. Within the sector, Coterra Energy Inc (Symbol: CTRA) and Marathon Oil Corp. (Symbol: MRO) are two large stocks that are lagging, showing a loss of 2.6% and 2.3%, respectively. Among energy ETFs, one ETF following the sector is the Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (Symbol: XLE), which is down 0.5% on the day, and up 70.90% year-to-date. Coterra Energy Inc, meanwhile, is up 60.79% year-to-date, and Marathon Oil Corp. is up 98.02% year-to-date. Combined, CTRA and MRO make up approximately 2.0% of the underlying holdings of XLE.

The next worst performing sector is the Consumer Products sector, not showing much of a gain. Among large Consumer Products stocks, Tesla Inc (Symbol: TSLA) and Newell Brands Inc (Symbol: NWL) are the most notable, showing a loss of 2.4% and 1.9%, respectively. One ETF closely tracking Consumer Products stocks is the iShares U.S. Consumer Goods ETF (IYK), which is down 0.1% in midday trading, and up 0.22% on a year-to-date basis. Tesla Inc, meanwhile, is down 45.42% year-to-date, and Newell Brands Inc, is down 37.84% year-to-date.

Comparing these stocks and ETFs on a trailing twelve month basis, below is a relative stock price performance chart, with each of the symbols shown in a different color as labeled in the legend at the bottom:


Here’s a snapshot of how the S&P 500 components within the various sectors are faring in afternoon trading on Tuesday. As you can see, six sectors are up on the day, while one sector is down.

Sector % Change
Materials +1.1%
Utilities +0.6%
Technology & Communications +0.6%
Industrial +0.5%
Financial +0.4%
Services +0.1%
Consumer Products -0.0%
Healthcare -0.0%
Energy -0.7%

10 ETFs With Stocks That Insiders Are Buying »

Also see:

• Top Ten Hedge Funds Holding PEY
• CULP Historical Stock Prices
• CAT DMA

The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.



Image and article originally from www.nasdaq.com. Read the original article here.