Among the underlying components of the Russell 3000 index, we saw noteworthy options trading volume today in Five Below Inc (Symbol: FIVE), where a total of 4,239 contracts have traded so far, representing approximately 423,900 underlying shares. That amounts to about 58.5% of FIVE’s average daily trading volume over the past month of 724,690 shares. Particularly high volume was seen for the $70 strike put option expiring December 16, 2022, with 553 contracts trading so far today, representing approximately 55,300 underlying shares of FIVE. Below is a chart showing FIVE’s trailing twelve month trading history, with the $70 strike highlighted in orange:
MetLife Inc (Symbol: MET) options are showing a volume of 25,772 contracts thus far today. That number of contracts represents approximately 2.6 million underlying shares, working out to a sizeable 57.6% of MET’s average daily trading volume over the past month, of 4.5 million shares.
Particularly high volume was seen for the $47.50 strike put option expiring June 16, 2023, with 7,000 contracts trading so far today, representing approximately 700,000 underlying shares of MET. Below is a chart showing MET’s trailing twelve month trading history, with the $47.50 strike highlighted in orange:
And Micron Technology Inc. (Symbol: MU) saw options trading volume of 100,082 contracts, representing approximately 10.0 million underlying shares or approximately 57.5% of MU’s average daily trading volume over the past month, of 17.4 million shares.
Particularly high volume was seen for the $60 strike call option expiring November 18, 2022, with 6,406 contracts trading so far today, representing approximately 640,600 underlying shares of MU. Below is a chart showing MU’s trailing twelve month trading history, with the $60 strike highlighted in orange:
For the various different available expirations for FIVE options, MET options, or MU options, visit StockOptionsChannel.com.
Also see:
ZSL Average Annual Return
ETON market cap history
IL Historical Stock Prices
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.
Image and article originally from www.nasdaq.com. Read the original article here.