Among the underlying components of the Russell 3000 index, we saw noteworthy options trading volume today in Royal Caribbean Group (Symbol: RCL), where a total of 17,968 contracts have traded so far, representing approximately 1.8 million underlying shares. That amounts to about 57.7% of RCL’s average daily trading volume over the past month of 3.1 million shares. Particularly high volume was seen for the $117 strike call option expiring February 16, 2024, with 2,656 contracts trading so far today, representing approximately 265,600 underlying shares of RCL. Below is a chart showing RCL’s trailing twelve month trading history, with the $117 strike highlighted in orange:
Disc Medicine Inc (Symbol: IRON) saw options trading volume of 1,170 contracts, representing approximately 117,000 underlying shares or approximately 57.6% of IRON’s average daily trading volume over the past month, of 203,255 shares.
Particularly high volume was seen for the $65 strike put option expiring June 21, 2024, with 1,118 contracts trading so far today, representing approximately 111,800 underlying shares of IRON. Below is a chart showing IRON’s trailing twelve month trading history, with the $65 strike highlighted in orange:
And Chesapeake Energy Corp. (Symbol: CHK) options are showing a volume of 10,919 contracts thus far today. That number of contracts represents approximately 1.1 million underlying shares, working out to a sizeable 57.1% of CHK’s average daily trading volume over the past month, of 1.9 million shares.
Especially high volume was seen for the $70 strike put option expiring February 16, 2024, with 4,626 contracts trading so far today, representing approximately 462,600 underlying shares of CHK. Below is a chart showing CHK’s trailing twelve month trading history, with the $70 strike highlighted in orange:
For the various different available expirations for RCL options, IRON options, or CHK options, visit StockOptionsChannel.com.
Also see:
Funds Holding CGRO
ETFs Holding TERP
Funds Holding SLAM
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.
Image and article originally from www.nasdaq.com. Read the original article here.