- (0:30) – Have You Ever Wanted To Invest Around Jim Cramer?
- (3:30) – AXS Short Innovation Daily and AXS 2x Innovation ETF: SARK & TARK
- (6:45) – Tuttle Inverse Cramer Tracker and Long Cramer Tracker ETF: SJIM & LJIM
- (11:50) – How Long Has Tuttle Capital Management Tracked Jim Cramer?
- (15:00) – What Can Investors Expect From Tuttle Capital In The Near Future?
- Podcast@Zacsk.com
In this episode of ETF Spotlight, I speak with Matthew Tuttle, CEO at Tuttle Capital Management, about two new ETFs that let investors bet on and against CNBC personality Jim Cramer.
The Long Cramer Tracker ETF LJIM seeks to replicate the performance of investments recommended by Cramer. Meta Platforms META and AMD AMD are among the top holdings currently.
The Inverse Cramer Tracker ETF SJIM holds short positions in his stock picks like NVIDIA NVDA and Tesla TSLA. It also invests in securities he recommends against.
Both ETFs will be actively managed and charge an expense ratio of 1.2% each. These funds hold between 20 to 50 securities in almost equal weights.
Tuttle was earlier quite successful with the AXS Short Innovation Daily ETF SARK, which bets against Cathie Wood’s ARK Innovation ETF ARKK.
Tune in to the podcast to learn more.
Make sure to be on the lookout for the next edition of the ETF Spotlight and remember to subscribe! If you have any comments or questions, please email podcast@zacks.com.
Want key ETF info delivered straight to your inbox?
Zacks’ free Fund Newsletter will brief you on top news and analysis, as well as top-performing ETFs, each week.
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (AMD) : Free Stock Analysis Report
NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) : Free Stock Analysis Report
Tesla, Inc. (TSLA) : Free Stock Analysis Report
ARK Innovation ETF (ARKK): ETF Research Reports
Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) : Free Stock Analysis Report
AXS Short Innovation Daily ETF (SARK): ETF Research Reports
Long Cramer Tracker ETF (LJIM): ETF Research Reports
Inverse Cramer Tracker ETF (SJIM): ETF Research Reports
To read this article on Zacks.com click here.
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.
Image and article originally from www.nasdaq.com. Read the original article here.