Brookfield Renewable Energy Partners (BEP) reported $645 million in revenue for the quarter ended December 2022, representing a year-over-year decline of 40.9%. EPS of -$0.16 for the same period compares to -$0.12 a year ago.
The reported revenue compares to the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $662.64 million, representing a surprise of -2.66%. The company delivered an EPS surprise of -300%, with the consensus EPS estimate being -$0.04.
While investors closely watch year-over-year changes in headline numbers — revenue and earnings — and how they compare to Wall Street expectations to determine their next course of action, some key metrics always provide a better insight into a company’s underlying performance.
As these metrics influence top- and bottom-line performance, comparing them to the year-ago numbers and what analysts estimated helps investors project a stock’s price performance more accurately.
Here is how Brookfield Renewable performed in the just reported quarter in terms of the metrics most widely monitored and projected by Wall Street analysts:
- Actual Generation- Hydroelectric- Colombia: 1222 GWh versus 1046.03 GWh estimated by four analysts on average.
- LTA Generation- Wind- Total: 1929 GWh versus 1950.32 GWh estimated by three analysts on average.
- Actual Generation- Hydroelectric- Total: 4609 GWh compared to the 4920.56 GWh average estimate based on three analysts.
- Actual Generation- Wind- North America: 1005 GWh versus 1318.72 GWh estimated by three analysts on average.
- Operating Revenue- Hydroelectric- Colombia: $68 million versus the eight-analyst average estimate of $65.40 million. The reported number represents a year-over-year change of +6.3%.
- Operating Revenue- Hydroelectric- Brazil: $55 million versus $49.09 million estimated by eight analysts on average. Compared to the year-ago quarter, this number represents a +44.7% change.
- Operating Revenue- Hydroelectric- North America: $219 million versus $224.34 million estimated by eight analysts on average. Compared to the year-ago quarter, this number represents a -7.6% change.
- Operating Revenue- Wind- Asia: $12 million compared to the $9.76 million average estimate based on seven analysts. The reported number represents a change of +50% year over year.
- Operating Revenue- Solar: $77 million compared to the $90.12 million average estimate based on seven analysts. The reported number represents a change of +13.2% year over year.
- Revenues – Hydroelectric: $342 million versus the seven-analyst average estimate of $350.19 million.
- Operating Revenue- Wind- Brazil: $8 million versus the seven-analyst average estimate of $7.01 million. The reported number represents a year-over-year change of +60%.
- Revenues – Wind: $143 million versus the seven-analyst average estimate of $166.63 million.
View all Key Company Metrics for Brookfield Renewable here>>>
Shares of Brookfield Renewable have returned +10.7% over the past month versus the Zacks S&P 500 composite’s +9% change. The stock currently has a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold), indicating that it could perform in line with the broader market in the near term.
Zacks Names “Single Best Pick to Double”
From thousands of stocks, 5 Zacks experts each have chosen their favorite to skyrocket +100% or more in months to come. From those 5, Director of Research Sheraz Mian hand-picks one to have the most explosive upside of all.
It’s a little-known chemical company that’s up 65% over last year, yet still dirt cheap. With unrelenting demand, soaring 2022 earnings estimates, and $1.5 billion for repurchasing shares, retail investors could jump in at any time.
This company could rival or surpass other recent Zacks’ Stocks Set to Double like Boston Beer Company which shot up +143.0% in little more than 9 months and NVIDIA which boomed +175.9% in one year.
Free: See Our Top Stock and 4 Runners Up >>
Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. (BEP) : Free Stock Analysis Report
To read this article on Zacks.com click here.
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.
Image and article originally from www.nasdaq.com. Read the original article here.